eInfochips vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.1/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.9/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for RFPs needing embedded engineering bundled with component sourcing. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive RFPs needing infotainment/digital cockpit scope at DXC scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2000 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 18,000 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow Electronics-owned engineering firm offering direct component-sourcing access alongside embedded engineering scope | Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++ | Embedded Linux, Android Automotive, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor | Automotive |
eInfochips vs Luxoft: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering firm, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company following Arrow's acquisition. For an RFP requiring component sourcing alongside engineering, the Arrow Electronics parent relationship is a genuine differentiator — direct supply-chain access most independent embedded vendors cannot offer. The firm's engagement models span fixed project, dedicated team, and staff augmentation, and design centers across India, Japan, and the US support round-the-clock delivery documentation for globally distributed procurement programs.
Luxoft
Luxoft, founded in 2000, became a recognized automotive software systems integrator before DXC Technology acquired it in 2019. DXC states its automotive software already powers over 50 million vehicles and that DXC partners with 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers. For an RFP evaluator, the practical due-diligence question is whether pre-acquisition Luxoft's automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's much larger enterprise IT portfolio — worth confirming directly during vendor qualification rather than assuming from the brand name.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Capability | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Criterion | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Dimension | eInfochips | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare | Automotive |
| Best use cases | RFPs bundling component sourcing and supply-chain risk with embedded engineering scope, Global procurement programs needing round-the-clock delivery across multiple design centers | In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise, OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Arrow Electronics ownership gives direct component-sourcing access, useful for RFPs that bundle supply-chain risk into the scope of work |
| + | 30-year product engineering history with 500+ documented deliveries supports strong reference-checking |
| + | Design centers across India, Japan, and the US support round-the-clock delivery documentation for global procurement programs |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger distribution company; confirm dedicated team continuity |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| - | Reported team size estimates vary significantly by source, making exact capacity harder to pin down for RFP scoring |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers |
| + | Recently announced AMBER in-vehicle infotainment platform demonstrates continued product investment post-DXC acquisition |
| + | Nearly 18,000-person international workforce across 44 cities supports globally distributed RFP programs |
| - | Acquired by DXC Technology in 2019 — confirm directly whether pre-acquisition automotive specialization survived integration into DXC's larger portfolio |
| - | Automotive-only embedded focus means no relevant track record outside the automotive procurement category |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: RFPs bundling component sourcing and supply-chain risk with embedded engineering scope.
Arrow Electronics-owned engineering firm offering direct component-sourcing access alongside embedded engineering scope. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: in-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise.
Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Luxoft
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFPs bundling component sourcing and supply-chain risk with embedded engineering scope | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Global procurement programs needing round-the-clock delivery across multiple design centers | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| In-vehicle infotainment and digital cockpit RFPs needing Android Automotive expertise | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Luxoft
eInfochips (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Development projects. Arrow Electronics-owned engineering firm offering direct component-sourcing access alongside embedded engineering scope.
Luxoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need OEM procurement wanting a systems integrator already partnered with major vehicle manufacturers. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Luxoft FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Luxoft?
eInfochips (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: arrow Electronics ownership gives direct component-sourcing access, useful for RFPs that bundle supply-chain risk into the scope of work. Luxoft's strongest advantage: automotive software deployed in over 50 million vehicles, with partnerships across 8 of the world's 10 largest vehicle manufacturers.
How do eInfochips and Luxoft differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Luxoft uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Luxoft?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Luxoft?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow Electronics-owned engineering firm offering direct component-sourcing access alongside embedded engineering scope. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 18,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.