ByteSnap Design
UK boutique combining electronic board design with embedded firmware development
Founded 2008 | Birmingham, United Kingdom | 11–50 employees
firmware-developmentelectrical-engineeringpcb-hardware-designfpga-programming
What is ByteSnap Design?
ByteSnap Design, founded in 2008 and headquartered in Birmingham, UK, runs a 38-person team holding ISO 9001:2015 certification and named partnerships with STMicroelectronics, NXP, Microchip, Digi, and Analog Devices. For an RFP requiring a quality-certified vendor, ISO 9001:2015 status is a checkable compliance item rather than a marketing claim. The firm's fixed-project pricing model and explicit design-rescue service category (distinct from greenfield development) are both worth calling out separately in an RFP's scope-of-work section, since a rescue engagement carries different risk and pricing assumptions than a from-scratch build.
ByteSnap Design works primarily with clients in Consumer Electronics, Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Broadcast/media sectors. Its primary differentiator is: ISO 9001:2015-certified UK boutique with a distinct design-rescue service category and named multi-vendor semiconductor partnerships.
ByteSnap Design tech stack and services
C/C++FreeRTOSEmbedded LinuxGStreamerFPGA (Verilog)Qt
| Service area |
|---|
| Firmware Development |
| Electrical Engineering |
| PCB / Hardware Design |
| FPGA Programming |
ByteSnap Design pricing
Short answer: ByteSnap Design uses a fixed project pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
ByteSnap Design does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
ByteSnap Design pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +ISO 9001:2015 certification is independently checkable, satisfying a common formal RFP quality-management requirement | -38-person team caps capacity for RFPs requiring several large parallel workstreams |
| +Explicit design-rescue service category distinct from greenfield development, useful for RFPs scoping remediation of an existing failing system | -UK-only delivery may carry a rate premium versus nearshore or offshore bids — factor into cost comparison |
| +Named partnerships across five semiconductor vendors reduce single-vendor lock-in risk in the technical scope of work | -No published rate card or minimum engagement figure for budget pre-qualification |
ByteSnap Design vs alternatives
How ByteSnap Design compares to the other top Embedded Development service providers.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | RFPs needing hardware, firmware, and cloud scope under... | Offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one ISO-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| DornerWorks | Aerospace/defense RFPs needing ITAR-clean FPGA and hypervisor scope. | US-incorporated aerospace/defense specialist with FPGA and Xen hypervisor scope, simplifying ITAR and export-control compliance documentation | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| SYSGO | Safety-critical RFPs requiring SIL 4-certified platform licensing. | Licensing-plus-services pricing structure around a SIL 4-certified RTOS/hypervisor, backed by Thales Group's long-term financial stability | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Bosch Engineering | RFPs valuing Bosch-grade quality documentation and component sourcing. | Wholly-owned Bosch Group subsidiary offering embedded-to-cloud service scope with manufacturing-grade quality documentation and direct component access | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Vector Informatik | RFPs specifying AUTOSAR-standard ECU tooling and engineering. | Primary commercial contributor to the AUTOSAR standard, offering licensing-plus-services pricing rather than pure custom-development labor | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Promwad | RFPs wanting hardware design through manufacturing handoff in... | End-to-end European design house covering PCB, FPGA, embedded Linux, and manufacturing coordination in a single procurement scope | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Elektrobit | Automotive RFPs needing production-scale AUTOSAR/ECU vendor references. | Software running in 600M+ vehicles gives RFP evaluators an independently verifiable production-scale reference, backed by Continental's Tier 1 relationships | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Witekio | RFPs wanting chip-to-cloud scope consolidated into one lot. | Covers the full chip-to-cloud stack — BSP, firmware, connectivity, security, and application layer — as a single procurement scope | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Klika Tech | RFPs requiring AWS Premier Partner status for edge-to-cloud... | AWS Premier Partner status specifically for edge-to-cloud IoT integration, a checkable qualification tier distinct from a generic cloud-partner claim | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Softeq Development | RFPs wanting hardware, firmware, and app layers in... | Full-stack US firm covering PCB-to-device hardware, low-level firmware, and consumer application software under a single contract | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Data Respons | Nordic RFPs needing embedded scope across multiple regulated... | Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight regulated sectors over nearly 40 years, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| eInfochips | RFPs needing embedded engineering bundled with component sourcing. | Arrow Electronics-owned engineering firm offering direct component-sourcing access alongside embedded engineering scope | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| KPIT Technologies | Large automotive RFPs requiring publicly-audited vendor financials. | Publicly-listed automotive embedded firm with audited financial disclosures and a named Renault Group strategic partnership | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| DMC, Inc. | RFPs bundling embedded controllers with factory automation systems. | Combines embedded systems engineering with manufacturing and test automation under one US-based vendor, avoiding a split-vendor integration gap | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Tata Elxsi | Large enterprises RFPing automotive embedded work alongside media/healthcare... | Broad ER&D scale spanning automotive, media/telecom, and healthcare over 35+ years, under the Tata Group umbrella | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Cyient | Aerospace/defense RFPs needing avionics engineering at scale. | Aerospace-focused embedded avionics practice (fly-by-wire, autopilot, collision avoidance) strengthened by the CERTON Software acquisition | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| GlobalLogic | RFPs wanting embedded scope inside a Hitachi-backed digital... | Hitachi Group-owned digital engineering scale with silicon and embedded hardware/software solutions plus a named Elektrobit automotive partnership | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Wind River | RFPs requiring a certified commercial RTOS with production... | Maker of VxWorks, a certified RTOS deployed in commercial and military aircraft, now majority-owned by automotive Tier 1 supplier Aptiv | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Luxoft | Automotive RFPs needing infotainment/digital cockpit scope at DXC... | Automotive software systems integrator with software in 50M+ vehicles, partnering with 8 of the 10 largest vehicle manufacturers, now under DXC Technology | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | Automotive RFPs wanting proven multi-brand navigation deployment experience. | Named production deployment: navigation technology used across 10+ global car brands and 10M+ vehicles, inside a broader IT outsourcing portfolio | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| QuEST Global | Multi-vertical RFPs needing embedded engineering alongside broader R&D. | Very broad engineering-services scale (90+ delivery centers, 18+ countries) offering end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering directly to chipmakers | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Avenga | RFPs wanting IoT engineering inside a broad digital... | Broad software, data, and IoT portfolio backed by scale from consolidating multiple acquired firms since 2017 | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Capgemini Engineering | Global RFPs needing embedded work inside a broad... | One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| LTTS | Large RFPs needing embedded engineering with public-company governance. | Publicly-listed engineering R&D scale (23,800+ engineers) backed by the L&T Group, spanning embedded, automotive, and industrial IoT | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| HCLTech | Global RFPs wanting embedded engineering as part of... | Embedded engineering delivered by the Engineering & R&D Services business unit inside one of the world's largest IT services companies | 3.6 | Full comparison |
ByteSnap Design FAQ
What is ByteSnap Design?
UK boutique combining electronic board design with embedded firmware development
How much does ByteSnap Design charge?
ByteSnap Design uses fixed project pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does ByteSnap Design use?
ByteSnap Design works with C/C++, FreeRTOS, Embedded Linux, GStreamer, FPGA (Verilog), Qt. Primary industries served include Consumer Electronics, Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Broadcast/media.
Is ByteSnap Design right for enterprise?
RFPs requiring ISO 9001 certification and design-rescue capability. 11–50 team size. Key consideration: 38-person team caps capacity for RFPs requiring several large parallel workstreams.
What are the best ByteSnap Design alternatives?
The best alternatives to ByteSnap Design depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: offers all three standard engagement models (consulting, staff aug, end-to-end delivery) under one iso-certified quality system spanning electrical through cloud
- DornerWorks: us-incorporated aerospace/defense specialist with fpga and xen hypervisor scope, simplifying itar and export-control compliance documentation
- SYSGO: licensing-plus-services pricing structure around a sil 4-certified rtos/hypervisor, backed by thales group's long-term financial stability
Compare ByteSnap Design with other Embedded Development service providers
ByteSnap Design vs Lemberg Solutions ByteSnap Design vs DornerWorks ByteSnap Design vs SYSGO ByteSnap Design vs Bosch Engineering ByteSnap Design vs Vector Informatik ByteSnap Design vs Promwad ByteSnap Design vs Elektrobit ByteSnap Design vs Witekio ByteSnap Design vs Klika Tech ByteSnap Design vs Softeq Development ByteSnap Design vs Data Respons ByteSnap Design vs eInfochips ByteSnap Design vs KPIT Technologies ByteSnap Design vs DMC, Inc. ByteSnap Design vs Tata Elxsi ByteSnap Design vs Cyient ByteSnap Design vs GlobalLogic ByteSnap Design vs Wind River ByteSnap Design vs Luxoft ByteSnap Design vs Intellias ByteSnap Design vs QuEST Global ByteSnap Design vs Avenga ByteSnap Design vs Capgemini Engineering ByteSnap Design vs LTTS ByteSnap Design vs HCLTech
Verify all details directly with ByteSnap Design before making a decision.