Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Data Respons (4.2/5) edges ahead of Capgemini Engineering (3.7/5) overall. Data Respons is the better choice for nordic RFPs needing embedded scope across multiple regulated sectors. Capgemini Engineering is the stronger option for global RFPs needing embedded work inside a broad engineering consultancy. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Data Respons | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1986 | 1982 |
| HQ | Høvik, Norway | Neuilly-sur-Seine, France |
| Team size | 1,400 | 45,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight regulated sectors over nearly 40 years, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions | One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS | Embedded Linux, C/C++, AUTOSAR |
| Industries served | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security | Automotive, Aerospace, Energy, Life sciences, Telecom |
Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering: overview
Data Respons
Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across transport & automotive, telecom & media, industrial automation, energy & maritime, medtech, space, defense & security, and finance & public sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan. For an RFP, the breadth across eight regulated sectors is a useful qualification signal, but two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies in 2020, then folded into Akkodis) mean procurement teams should request current organizational-continuity documentation as part of vendor due diligence rather than assume stability from the historical brand alone.
Capgemini Engineering
Capgemini Engineering traces to Altran Technologies, founded in 1982 in France, which Capgemini acquired in 2019 and rebranded in 2021. Now employing an estimated 45,000-52,000 people worldwide, electronics and embedded engineering represents one technical domain within an extremely broad engineering-and-innovation consulting portfolio. For an RFP evaluator comparing rebranded legacy consultancies, the practical due-diligence question is which pre-2019 Altran teams and client relationships remain intact inside the larger Capgemini organizational structure — worth confirming directly rather than inferring from the name change.
Services and capabilities: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Capability | Data Respons | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Framework / platform | Data Respons | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Bluetooth | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Criterion | Data Respons | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Dimension | Data Respons | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime | Automotive, Aerospace, Energy |
| Best use cases | Maritime or defense procurement needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech RFPs requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist with a long independent operating history | Very large multi-domain RFPs where embedded is one workstream among several, Global enterprise procurement wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering: pros and cons
| Data Respons | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct regulated sectors supports strong reference-checking |
| + | Nordic regional presence plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC procurement requirements |
| + | Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions |
| - | Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA 2020, then Akkodis) — request current organizational-continuity documentation as part of vendor due diligence |
| - | 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent RFP lots |
| - | No published rate card or minimum engagement figure |
| Capgemini Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Extremely large global scale (45,000+ engineers) can absorb RFP lots no boutique or mid-size firm could staff alone |
| + | Broad engineering domains beyond embedded (mechanical, systems, cloud) available under one contract for complex multi-domain procurement |
| + | 40+ year engineering consulting heritage predating the 2019 Capgemini acquisition and 2021 rebrand |
| - | Rebranded from Altran in 2021 after the 2019 Capgemini acquisition — confirm directly which legacy Altran teams remain intact inside the larger organization |
| - | Embedded/electronics engineering is one technical domain within an extremely broad portfolio, not a dedicated specialization |
| - | Scale and process overhead of a firm this size is a poor fit for small, fast-moving RFP lots |
Who should choose Data Respons?
A typical fit: maritime or defense procurement needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.
Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight regulated sectors over nearly 40 years, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.
Who should choose Capgemini Engineering?
A typical fit: very large multi-domain RFPs where embedded is one workstream among several.
One of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Aerospace, Energy, Life sciences, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Data Respons |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Data Respons |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Data Respons (Not disclosed) vs Capgemini Engineering (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Data Respons |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Capgemini Engineering |
Use case fit: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
| Use case | Data Respons fit | Capgemini Engineering fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maritime or defense procurement needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity | Strong | Limited | Data Respons |
| Medtech RFPs requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist with a long independent operating history | Strong | Limited | Data Respons |
| Very large multi-domain RFPs where embedded is one workstream among several | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| Global enterprise procurement wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering
Data Respons (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Development projects. Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight regulated sectors over nearly 40 years, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions.
Capgemini Engineering (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need global enterprise procurement wanting a single engineering vendor across mechanical, embedded, and cloud. If your situation matches that, Capgemini Engineering is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Data Respons vs Capgemini Engineering FAQ
Is Data Respons better than Capgemini Engineering?
Data Respons (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct regulated sectors supports strong reference-checking. Capgemini Engineering's strongest advantage: extremely large global scale (45,000+ engineers) can absorb RFP lots no boutique or mid-size firm could staff alone.
How do Data Respons and Capgemini Engineering differ in pricing?
Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Capgemini Engineering uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Data Respons or Capgemini Engineering?
Capgemini Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Data Respons and Capgemini Engineering?
Data Respons's primary differentiator is: nordic embedded specialist spanning eight regulated sectors over nearly 40 years, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Capgemini Engineering's primary differentiator is: one of the largest global engineering consultancies by headcount, with embedded/electronics as one of many technical domains covered. They also differ in team size (1,400 vs 45,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media vs Automotive, Aerospace).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.